<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Modeling Mentor Blog &#187; skinny</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.modelingmentor.com/blog/tag/skinny/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.modelingmentor.com/blog</link>
	<description>Trustworthy Advice for Models, Actors &#38; Moms</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 May 2023 14:43:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>More Proof That It&#8217;s Better to Be a Model Than a Supermodel</title>
		<link>https://www.modelingmentor.com/blog/more-proof-that-its-better-to-be-a-model-than-a-supermodel/</link>
		<comments>https://www.modelingmentor.com/blog/more-proof-that-its-better-to-be-a-model-than-a-supermodel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 23:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beauty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chanel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fashion world]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gemma Ward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Page Six Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skinny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supermodel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.modelingmentor.com/blog/?p=106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The Betrayal of a Supermodel&#8221;—so read the title of a recent article by Sarah Horne in the New York Post&#8217;s Page Six Magazine. The writer traced the rise and fall of supermodel Gemma Ward, who whizzed into the modeling spotlight as a wispy sixteen-year-old and got shoved back into the wings a few years and a few—15 [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Betrayal of a Supermodel&#8221;—so read the title of a recent article by Sarah Horne in the <em>New York Post&#8217;s Page Six Magazine. </em>The writer traced the rise and fall of supermodel Gemma Ward, who whizzed into the modeling spotlight as a wispy sixteen-year-old and got shoved back into the wings a few years and a few—15 give or take—pounds later.</p>
<p>Now, first of all, I have an issue with the way this story is framed. The article includes a photo of Ward walking in the Chanel show that apparently did her in. The picture reveals a girl who may be in the &#8220;normal&#8221; weight range for the general public, but, let&#8217;s face it, models are held to a higher standard. Models needn&#8217;t be emaciated (more on that later), but they do have to maintain a fairly consistent size so the clients booking them know what to expect. That&#8217;s just part of the job. By the looks of Ward&#8217;s thighs in this shot, I would say Chanel<em> </em>was betrayed, not the model. It&#8217;s one thing to tell a toothpick-sized girl to lose weight; it&#8217;s another to tell a supermodel making $3 million a year that if she lets herself go, she&#8217;s out. I&#8217;d say that&#8217;s fair enough. Ward continued to gain weight after her infamous Chanel appearance, which is totally fine—most women do as they hit their 20s (I gained my freshman-15 back then and had a jolly time doing it!). But, by doing so, Ward made the choice to move on, reportedly to acting. Good for her. After making millions, why not?</p>
<p>So why do I say it&#8217;s better to be a model than a <em>super</em>model? Well, when you are just a lowly model, if anyone is discussing the size of your thighs, it&#8217;s a client and/or your agent, not press and bloggers worldwide. Also, you are likely to have a couple of extra inches wiggle room before anyone gets into a heated discussion about your measurements. Most of my 5&#8217;10&#8243; modeling friends and I hovered near 130 pounds. According to Horne&#8217;s article, 5&#8217;9&#8243; top model Natalia Vodianova received complaints from clients when she weighed 115 and 5&#8217;10&#8243; Coco Rocha resorted to diuretics when she was told to drop below 108! All I can say is that I, at 124 pounds (achieved due to a crush on a male model, not any extreme diet measures) was told to gain weight (German clients—bless them).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying models of the non-super variety are exempt from the weight watch. I did get some flak about cellulite once or twice and about my widening middle when I overdid it at Christmas and showed up for a swimwear shoot packing a few extra pounds. My response? Well, yes, I have cellulite and it&#8217;s unsightly stuff, and yes, I shouldn&#8217;t show up at a shoot without the waist that appeared on my comp card. That&#8217;s false advertising. And I&#8217;m not saying the fashion world isn&#8217;t vicious at the top or that some of the girls walking the big-time runways aren&#8217;t sickeningly skinny and that some of them got that way through sick means; I&#8217;m just saying forget the millions at the top and stick with the five-to-six-figure career—there are burgers and beer down here, not barfing and bad press.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.modelingmentor.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/SophieBurgerBlog.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-107" title="SophieBurgerBlog" src="https://www.modelingmentor.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/SophieBurgerBlog-300x199.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="199" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.modelingmentor.com/blog/more-proof-that-its-better-to-be-a-model-than-a-supermodel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
